Free «Response Paper From the Argument Design» UK Essay Paper
Table of Contents
The Argument from the Design, a teleological argument, reiterates that the universe resembles machines such as the microwave meaning that it could have been made by an Intelligent Designer. The argument present the view that parts of nature appear in a related manner similar to the parts of a machine hence making reaching a conclusion that the universe could also have been made by an Intelligent Designer (Rowe, 74). The Argument from the Design dismisses the natural nature of the universe by asserting that such complex features could not appear naturally and could not be arranged in a beautiful manner by natural forces. Therefore, the Argument from the Design does not seem to recognize God as the creator of the universe.
The cosmological argument starts by making an inference to a natural being, God, in its assertions. The argument reiterates that all beings and things on the universe are automatically dependent or contingent. It affirms that the universe is contingent and it derives its existence from a superior force referred to as God. It believes in the natural formation of the universe and the creation of the universe by God. Therefore, most things in the universe are dependent on God because of their nature of creation.
Determination of the Stronger Argument
The cosmological argument is stronger than the Argument from the Design because of various significant reasons.
First, the cosmological argument is stronger than the Argument from the Design because it presents the identity of the being behind the creation of the universe. Notably, the cosmological argument starts with the assertion that all beings and things on the universe are dependent on a particular being. This being is a natural force, God, and is responsible for the creation of the universe. This means that the specific force behind the creation of the universe is God and is known through these assertions. The Argument from the Design is not specific in mentioning the person behind the creation of the universe. It only holds that the universe resembles machines and could have been created by an Intelligent Designer, who is not mentioned. Therefore, the presentation of specific details makes the cosmological argument stronger than the Argument from Design.
Limited Time offer!
Get 19% OFF
Second, cosmological argument is stronger in the sense it utilizes deductive arguments to come up with an ultimate conclusion that is satisfactory and reasonable. It begins by making specific inferences about the world and relates them to the existence of a natural being. It identifies closer relationships between the world and the natural being that could have been responsible for their creation. It also draws to the natural nature of the universe and links it to God before coming to a conclusion that God is actually responsible for the creation. On the other hand, the Argument from the design employs an inductive approach where it compares the universe to machines. This argument is not realistic as these are two distinct items existing in different places.
Last, the argument from the cosmological argument is stronger than the Argument from the Design because it presents a complete explanation of what exists contingently. The argument emphasizes that all things and beings on the universe exhibit contingent existence and they therefore originate from a particular natural force (Rowe, 102). The nature force is referred to as God and this force is responsible for the appearance of the universe and its overall nature. On the other hand, the Argument from the Design does not provide a complete explanation of the contingent existence of the universe. It only points to the creation of the universe by an Intelligent Designer without providing its contingency hence lack of adequate understandability.
Do you need professionally written papers?
Place your order on our website to get help from qualified experts!Order now